Legal Opinion

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Cantley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1998No. 1961972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., we granted the defendants, Lorillard Tobacco Company, Inc. ("Lorillard"), and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ("Reynolds"), permission to appeal the trial court's interlocutory order granting a Rule 60, Ala.R.Civ.P., motion to set aside a summary judgment that it had entered against the plaintiff, Mikki Cantley, in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of her father, Harlon Godfrey. We reverse and remand.

This is the second time these parties have been before this Court. See Cantley v. Lorillard Tobacco Co., 681 So.2d 1057 (Ala. 1996), for a full…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. R.E. Grills, Inc. v. DavisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Nowlin v. Druid City Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. A.S. v. R.S.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Osborn v. RocheSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. IMPROVED BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS v. MossCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Bryant v. First Tuskegee BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API