Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cobb
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc., and Ann Holman, appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The notice of appeal was not timely filed, and the appeal is dismissed ex mero motu.
The trial court denied the defendants' motion to compel arbitration on December 10, 1996. The denial of a motion to compel arbitration is an appealable order, and the defendants had 42 days in which to appeal. A.G. Edwards and Sons v. Clark,558 So.2d 358 (Ala. 1990). However, on December 27, 1996, the defendants filed a motion to alter, amend, or vacate the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- ALA. FARM BUREAU MUT. CAS. INS. CO. v. BoswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Cornelius v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Wilson v. Leck's 66 Service StationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. CantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Bowater Inc. v. ZagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Luker v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Luker v. CarrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.