Legal Opinion
City and County of San Francisco v. Ballard
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 2006No. A107227, A108569PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
The City and County of San Francisco and the People, by and through the City Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco (collectively, city), filed a complaint against Thomas O. Ballard. City alleged, among other things, that the 84-unit brick and wood-frame building owned by Ballard (the building) was a public nuisance because its partial sprinkler system was not in compliance with the fire prevention statutes for high-rise structures (Health & Saf. Code, § 13210 et seq.). City asserted that the building was a high-rise and must have an automatic fire sprinkler…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Lawrence v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- BARSAMIAN v. City of KingsburgDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.