Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Richardson

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nathan D. Lapham,

Official Referee. By order dated December 8, 1950, Mr. Justice Dickstein referred this uncontested action for annulment to me as Official Referee to hear and report. The hearing was held on January 22,1951.

Plaintiff testified that she and the defendant had known one another, and kept company, for three years prior to their marriage in a religious ceremony, January 30, 1949; that on May 30, 1948, she received her engagement ring and at that time he told her she would not have to work following their marriage, and they talked about where they would live, that they wanted two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Shonfeld v. ShonfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Winston v. . WinstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. de Baillet-Latour v. de Baillet-LatourNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Winston v. WinstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maslow v. MaslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Riedl v. RiedlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Bruno v. BrunoNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lopez v. LopezNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Dougherty v. DoughertyNew York Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API