Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Winston v. Winston

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1903No. 227PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Daniel E. Lynch for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 ; Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 181 U. S. 179 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Streitwolf v. StreitwolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. de Baillet-Latour v. de Baillet-LatourNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of BriggsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. Ward v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Richardson v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API