Ferris v. V.I. Industrial Gases, Inc.
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the CourtO'Brien, Judge
*185MEMOEANDUM OPINION
The question presented in this motion for summary judgment is whether intentional torts should be excepted from the exclusivity of the workmen’s compensation remedy. In line with the vast majority of American jurisdictions, we hold that employers are liable at common law for injuries deliberately inflicted on employees. However, the plaintiff has failed to state a claim under this exception and his tort action must, therefore, be dismissed.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff Fitzroy Ferris’ job description as an employee of defendant Virgin Islands Industrial Gases, Inc. (“VIGAS”), was to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robles v. Hovensa, L.L.C.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- Mingolla v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1995
- Aristide v. United Dominion Constructors, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1994
- Donastorg v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2003
- Gass v. Virgin Islands Telephone Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.