Mercury Aviation Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an award of the "Industrial Accident Commission. Award affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The award of the Industrial Accident Commission here under review is based upon the following facts: On October 9, 1919, George C. Freeman, employed by the Mercury Aviation Company as a mechanic, received an injury to his right arm while cranking an airplane motor in the course of employment. After an interval of five weeks, during which he was totally disabled, the employee resumed work with the Mercury Aviation Company, but because of his injury was unable to continue his duties as a mechanic and performed only “light work.” From the date of his injury in October, 1919, until April, 1920,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Blackford v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Willett Martin Co. v. S. E. & H. L. Shepherd Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Winona Oil Co. v. SmithsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Herrera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.