Legal Opinion
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12455PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
On rehearing we are satisfied with and reassert the views expressed in our former opinion filed December 27, 1930, except as to one point. On the question of the jurisdiction of the Industrial Accident Commission, after the two hundred and forty-five weeks of continuing jurisdiction had expired, to make the award of “further medical and hospital treatment as (the injured employee) may reasonably need from time to time”, we have reached a different conclusion, as will presently be made to appear, from that first announced. As to all other matters, we adopt our former opinion, viz.:
“Jack J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- New York Cent. R. Co. v. Bianc. American Knife Co. v. Sweeting. Clark Knitting Co., Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- De Zeng Standard Co. v. PresseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Flock v. J. C. Palumbo Fruit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- DeCelle v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.