Legal Opinion

Winona Oil Co. v. Smithson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1922No. 12448PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Original action by Winona Oil Company and Consolidated Underwriters, as petitioners, against John Clark Smithson and State Industrial Commission of the State of Oklahoma, as respondents, to reverse and vacate award of State Industrial Commission of workmen's compensation.

1Opinion of the CourtKbnnamer, J.

This action was commenced in this court by Winona Oil Company and Consolidated Underwriters, as petitioners, against John Clark Smithson and State Industrial Commission, respondents, to reverse and vacate an award made on June TO, 1921, by the State Industrial Commission in favor of John Clark Smithson awarding to the respondent, John Clark Smithson, $38 per week for a period of 100 weeks fur the loss -of the use of his left eye.

The essential facts as disclosed by the record are: That John Clark Smithson, on the 17th day of May, 1920, while employed by tbe Winona Oil Company, went to tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Robbins v. Original Gas Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Henly v. Oklahoma Union R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Hercules Powder Co. v. Morris County Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. DoleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Swatek Construction Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Associated Seed Growers, Inc. v. ScroghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Andrews Mining & Milling Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API