Legal Opinion

Litka v. City of Anacortes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1932No. 23502. Department OnePublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

The respondents own real property bordering on lake Campbell, together with the riparian rights. Lake Campbell is a comparatively small body of water, embracing an area of approximately 320 acres, and is non-navigable. Its average depth is estimated to be from eight to ten feet. The respondents acquired the property some fifteen years ago, and soon thereafter they constructed a dwelling house, a bath house, several cabins and a dock. They operated a small store, served meals, rented boats for hire, conducted a bathing beach, camp ground, had houses and cabins for rent throughout the year to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Madson v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Martha Lake Water Co. No. 1 v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. In Re Clinton Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API