Ohlstein v. Hillcrest Paper Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a motion by certain defendants to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency on the grounds that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), that the plaintiff does not have legal capacity to sue (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 2) and that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 3). Based upon a supporting affidavit, the defendants also move, in the alternative, under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint in that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Cushman v. Thayer Manufacturing Jewelry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Ward v. . PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Bank of Havana v. . MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hand v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Harris v. AverickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Ascher Corp. v. HorvathNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Puro v. PuroNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Hand v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008