Legal Opinion

Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSears, P. J.

The order appealed from dismisses the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that the plaintiff had not capacity to sue. The defendants’ motion to dismiss was made under the provisions of subdivision 3 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The order upon which the motion was brought on required the plaintiff to show cause “ why the complaint herein should not be dismissed and the defendants have judgment accordingly, upon the ground that the plaintiff is not a party in interest and has not legal capacity to sue, he — said plaintiff — having resigned as a trustee under the voting trust…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Ward v. . PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Matter of Morse (Bank of America)New York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Community Board 7 v. SchafferNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  3. Union Trust Co. v. Main & South Streets Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Brentmore Estates, Inc. v. Hotel Barbizon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Iannucci v. Kucker & Bruh, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API