Legal Opinion

Puro v. Puro

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSidney H. Asch, J.

Plaintiff moves to reargue the determination of this court which granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and which denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss certain counterclaims and affirmative defenses.

Plaintiff, Arthur Puro, seeks to invoke the equity powers of this court to compel Louis Puro and his codefendants to elect Arthur a director and officer of Purofied Down Products Corp. ("Purofied”) pursuant to a stockholders’ agreement dated May 1, 1951.

In 1945 Louis and Sam Puro wished to give their younger brothers an equity interest in Purofied. Joseph and Jacob were given stock…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Manson v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Walker v. GerliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Gifford v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dubin v. MuchnickNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Killeen v. Community HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API