Harris v. Averick
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a stockholder’s derivative action involving United States Hoffman Machinery Corporation. The defendants Brewster and Hoffman Machinery (the subject corporation) move, upon the complaint and a supporting affidavit, ‘ ‘ for an order and judgment, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissing the amended complaint herein upon the ground that plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue and the amended complaint is insufficient in law for lack *1040of allegations therein to excuse plaintiff’s failure to make a demand upon the corporate defendant to bring an action.”
Buie 107 permits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flynn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Ward v. . PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- O'Connor v. . Virginia Passenger Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Werfel v. KramarskyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1974
- Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Ascher Corp. v. HorvathNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Harris v. AverickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.