Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Howser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for attorney fees for the representation of defendant in a divorce case. The com*353plaint sought payment of $7,060.34. as the balance- due and owing for such legal services. The case was tried before the court, without a jury. Defendant appeals from a judgment in the sum of $3,060.34.

Defendant’s first assignment. of error is that the court erred in overruling defendant’s objection to the admission of any evidence in support of plaintiff’s claim because of his failure to comply with defendant’s demand under ORS 16.470 for a verified statement of the items of the account alleged…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Martin v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Miller v. Village of MullanIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Elmore v. TingleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Haines Commercial Equipment Co. v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cooley v. RomanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. White v. NoothDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API