Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Roman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 1978No. A75-455, CA 9455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for payment for certain legal services, alleging an "account stated.” Defendant filed a general denial. Both parties then filed motions for summary judgment supported by affidavits. The trial court denied summary judgment to plaintiff and granted summary judgment to defendant. Plaintiff’s motion to set aside the judgment was denied.

Plaintiff appeals, claiming (1) summary judgment should have been granted in his favor, (2) summary judgment should not have been granted to defendant, and (3) the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the judgment represented an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steinmetz v. GrennonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sunshine Dairy v. Jolly JoanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Crim v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Willis v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Thomas v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cooley v. RomanOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cooley v. RomanOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tri-County Ins., Inc. v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Western Steel & Ship Repair, Inc. v. RMI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API