Legal Opinion
Zeligson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 27, 1929No. A-6539PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Noble county of the crime of grand larceny and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of three years. Motion for new trial and motion in arrest of judgment were duly filed and overruled, and the defendant brings the cause to this court by petition in error.
The first assignment of error is: “The court erred in holding in this case that the information was sufficient to state a public offense and was sufficient to state the crime of larceny.” The charging part of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Carson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Strong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Guthery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Ex Parte ZeligsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Lordi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- Nance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.