Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Zeligson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 5, 1930No. A-7462PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges that he is illegally restrained of his liberty by the warden of the state peniten tiary at MeAlester; that said restraint is under a commitment issued upon a judgment and sentence of the district court of Noble county; that said commitment is void, for the reason that petitioner, in the district court of Noble county on November 30, 1925, was charged by information with grand larceny; that he was tried in March, 1926, and at the close of the state’s case petitioner demurred to the evidence and requested an instructed verdict;…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Whitten v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Phillips v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Ex Parte KirkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.