Dillon v. William S. Scull Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
In this action of trespass for negligence the defendant offered no testimony, the court declined its point for binding instructions, and the jury found for -the plaintiff. Judgment having been entered on the verdict, defendant appeals, assigning as error the refusal of its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Therefore the sole question is whether the evidence will sustain the jury’s finding of defendant’s negligence, giving the plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences and deductions therefrom. We are of the opinion that the verdict and judgment should be…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Loch v. ConfairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Parrillo v. Giroux Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- Izzi v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- MacK v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Giles v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.