Legal Opinion

Iannone v. Frederic R. Harris, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1996No. 93 Civ. 4865 (JGK) (JCF)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

FRANCIS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Obscenity, like beauty, is often in the eye of the beholder. The subjective nature of obscenity has .an impact not only on First Amendment jurisprudence, see Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197, 84 S.Ct. 1676, 1683, 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964) (while acknowledging difficulty of defining obscenity, Justice Stewart stated, “I know it when I see it”) (Stewart, J., concurring), but also, as this case demonstrates, on claims of gender discrimination.

The plaintiff in this action, Carla Iannone, contended that her employer, Frederic R.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Greenbaum v. HandelsbankenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. MacMillan v. Millennium Broadway HotelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. U.S. EEOC v. W & O, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API