Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Carson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1975No. Civ. 45079PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

In this appeal from a judgment for defendant-respondent in an action for damage to property, appellants contend the trial court prejudicially erred in refusing requested conditional res ipsa loquitur instructions and in commenting to the jury so as to confuse it and prejudice the plaintiffs’ case. We conclude that the trial court prejudicially erred in not instructing on the applicability of conditional res ipsa loquitur to the case at bench and accordingly reverse the judgment.

In 1965, Mr. Norman Gordon leased a segment of plaintiffs Pappas’ shopping center to establish…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Brown v. George Pepperdine FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. LaPorte v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Golden v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. S. S. Kresge Co. v. Port of LongviewCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Sportique Fashions, Inc. v. SullivanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API