Neurological Resources, P.C. v. Anthem Insurance
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This action presents important and recurring questions about the standards that courts apply when reviewing decisions to deny benefits under employee benefit plans governed by the federal Employees Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The issues are whether standard terms in group health insurance plans that do not explicitly grant discretionary power to a plan administrator to construe ambiguous terms or to determine eligibility for benefits nevertheless satisfy the standards established in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Physicians Multispecialty Group v. Health Care Plan of Horton Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Dallas County Hospital District v. Associates' Health & Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Wolpert v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Miller v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Griffin v. Health Systems Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.