Legal Opinion

Engle v. Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare Plan

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 31, 1999No. 2:97-cv-00317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPRINGMANN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Daniel and Bonnie Engle brought a declaratory judgment action against Wal-Mart Associates’ Health and Welfare Plan . (“the Plan”) in Indiana state court to require the Plan to reduce its right of reimbursement from their state court settlement by one-third. The Plan removed the Engles’ action because their claim presented a federal question under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The Plan also filed a counterclaim against the Engles under § 1132(a)(8), seeking to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare Plan v. WillardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare Plan v. WillardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Bishop v. BurgardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Fairfield Manufacturing Co. v. HartmanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001
  5. Bishop v. BurgardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API