Legal Opinion

Evans v. Batten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1964No. 248PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PeR Cueiam.

Plaintiff appellant contends that the facts alleged are sufficient to show that the indenture was a dangerous condition to defendant’s knowledge, defendant should have foreseen that rain, melting snow and ice would flow across and tend to obscure it, and defendant neglected to give warning. We do not agree. Slight depressions, unevenness and irregularities in outdoor walkways, sidewalks and streets are so common that their presence is to be anticipated by prudent persons. We are unable to distinguish this case from those in a long line of decisions by this Court. For examples, see:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Little v. Wilson Oil CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Welling v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Bagwell v. Town of BrevardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Falatovitch v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Perrell v. BEATY SERVICE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pulley v. Rex HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Newsom v. ByrnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Prevette v. Wilkes General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Pulley v. Rex HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Burnie v. Guilford Tech. Comm. CollegeNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API