Legal Opinion

Dengeles v. Young

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel Rabin, J.

This is a proceeding to require the chief inspector of the building department of the Town of Hempstead to issue a building permit for a structure characterized as a diner in petitioners’ application for said permit.

The application was denied, the reason given being that it was “ not a permitted use, application to town hoard required.”

The Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Hempstead under which the application was made is article 7, Business District, the pertinent sections of which follow:

‘ ‘ Sec. X-1.0. In a Business District the following regulations shall apply:

*693" A building may be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of Stamford v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Welch v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. City of Albany v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Vitolo v. ChaveNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Dengeles v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  4. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API