Rottkamp v. Young
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHopkins, J.
Since the defendants, by their motion under rule 112 of the former Buies of Civil Practice, challenge the sufficiency of the complaints in these consolidated actions, we accept the allegations of the complaints as true.
The pleadings in substance allege the following facts:(1) On March 12, 1955, plaintiffs Bottkamp, as landlords, and plaintiffs Lambran and Smirles (together with Chris Dengeles), as tenants, entered into a lease of real property at East Meadow, New York. The lease provided for the erection and maintenance of a diner by the tenants on the demised premises. At the time of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Kendall v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tarter v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.