Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rottkamp v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1964Published

1Dissent

Ughetta, Acting P. J. (dissenting).

Assuming the factual allegations of the complaints to be true, plaintiffs Bottkamp (in the one complaint) are owners, and plaintiffs (in the companion complaint) are lessees, of a parcel of real estate in *378defendant town. Application for a permit to build a diner thereon was willfully refused on May 9, 1955 by defendant Young, who is Manager of the Building Department and Chief Building Inspector of the town, and by the town itself, and thereafter by the Town Board on August 25, 1955.

Despite a Supreme Court order of December 1, 1955 directing Young to issue…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Dubow v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Calton Court, Inc. v. SwitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Matter of Fairchild Sons, Inc. v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Fairchild Sons, Inc. v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API