Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court after trial and presents a claim by utility companies that the Government breached a contract to provide enrichment services by improperly including various costs in the price charged for such services.
FACTS
Florida Power & Light Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Empresa Nacional del Uranio, S.A., IES Utilities, Inc., Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company, as well as the later-added Virginia Electric and Power Company and Duke Energy Corporation…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fanning, Phillips and Molnar v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- James M. Ellett Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023