Legal Opinion
Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 28, 2003No. 96-644CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Before the court after remand from the Federal Circuit is a case brought by utility companies that produce nuclear power to recover overpayments for enrichment of uranium. Plaintiffs take the position that the case has been remanded for further development of the record; defendant urges in its Motion for Entry of Judgment on the Record, which is the subject of this opinion, that the matter can be resolved on the existing record. Argument has been held on defendant’s motion.
The mandate, as interpreted by defendant, requires the trial court to determine whether the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Barsebäck Kraft AB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Dr. Raymond G. TRONZO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIOMET, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Independence Park Apartments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004