Enyeart v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
This mandamus proceeding presents the question of whether respondent Board of Supervisors of Orange County correctly determined that written protests against the proposed incorporation of a new city represented 51 percent of properly includible assessed valuation and so required termination of the incorporation proceeding as provided by section 34311 of the Government Code. We have concluded that although as held by the trial court protests by owners of oil and gas leases may be included, sufficient protests were not timely filed here to warrant the termination. Accordingly the trial court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- San Mateo City School District v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Malcolm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Property Research Financial Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.