Malcolm v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
In this writ proceeding, petitioners, defendants in the underlying action (hereafter defendants), seek review of a trial court order denying their pretrial motion to expunge a notice of lis pendens pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 409.1. Defendants contend that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in passing upon their motion to expunge, and assert that on the basis of the affidavits and the other evidence presented, the court abused its discretion in denying their motion.
For the reasons discussed below, we have concluded that the order of the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Nash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. Jerry R.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sharon S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Orange County, California Airport Hotel Associates, a California Limited Partnership v. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Urez Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Coppinger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.