Atkinson v. Western Development Syndicate
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Page, McCutchen, Knight & Olney, and McCutehen, Olney & Willard, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The nature of the case is set forth in the opinion in Atkinson v. Western Development Syndicate et al., (S. F. No. 6360), ante, p. 503, [150Pac. 360], just filed.
The motion for a new trial was based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. The evidence thus claimed to have been discovered was directed to the question of the solvency of The Gray Brothers Crushed Rock Company at the time of the transfer of its property to the Golden Gate Tile Company. Even if we assume that the evidence offered would have established the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Childs v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bacciocco v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re Estate of HarknessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. Ocean Park Scenic Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916