Legal Opinion

Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wartman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 2014No. A13-0937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODENBERG, Judge.

Appellant Arnica Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent Thomas B. Wartman dismissing appellant’s suit claiming entitlement to “piercing of the corporate veil” because the underlying judgment against the corporate entity had expired under Minn.Stat. § 541.04. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent was the owner and sole shareholder of Landform, Inc., which built a home in Shorewood. Appellant insured the home under a homeowner’s policy. In 2001, appellant paid a claim for water damage at the Shorewood home.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Snyder Electric Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. John S. Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Cadle Co. v. SeavallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Charlene Karen Jundt v. Marcus Edward JundtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API