Legal Opinion

Haas v. Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1995No. 571PA93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The primary issue presented on this appeal is whether plaintiffs’ evidence was sufficient to take the case to the jury on the issue of whether defendants breached the standard of care owed plaintiffs. We conclude that it was; therefore, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case for further proceedings.

This legal malpractice action had its genesis in an abortive effort by defendant Warren and his law firm to save money in a foreclosure proceeding by advertising the sale of land located in Franklin County in a Wake County newspaper. Warren, trustee for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Haas v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Zee Co. v. Williams, Mullen, Clark & Dobbins, P.C.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. Drake v. AstiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API