Legal Opinion

Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 2003No. COA02-477PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A. (the firm) and Tracy K. Lischer (Lischer), individually and as agent of the firm, (collectively, defendants) appeal from (1) a judgment filed 7 May 2001 entered consistent with a jury verdict finding David Norman Hummer (plaintiff) was damaged by defendants’ negligence and awarding damages, and (2) an order dated 31 May 2001 denying defendants’ motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the judgment filed 7 May 2001. 1

On 13 February 1998, plaintiff and Cynthia Wax Hummer filed a complaint…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Overton v. Goldsboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Clark v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Smith v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Royster v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Formyduval v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Young v. GumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Capitol City Homes, LLC v. Starlight Homes N.C., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  5. Carter v. Clements Walker PllcNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API