State v. Tall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kerr, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The defendant Tall was indicted with two others, Partello and Thaden, for forgery in the second degree. He had a separate trial. The offence set forth in the indictment consisted of the disposing and putting off, to one Christianson, of a forged mortgage note purporting to have been executed by one Christian P. Linstad, and payable to the order of one Herrick, the defendants knowing the same to be forged. The note was dated September 5, 1888. The offence is charged to have been committed on the 8th of March, 1889. The state called as a witness Linstad," whose name was subscribed to the note…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bullard v. . PearsallNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Miller v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Stewart v. ColterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Burgess v. Sims Drug Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- State v. WalenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.