Board of Transportation v. Rand

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff argues the trial court erred in its charge by failing to instruct the jury concerning general and special benefits to defendants’ property resulting from the highway project. We find no error.

Defendants’ evidence tended to show the value of their remaining property was reduced by reason of the condemnation.

Plaintiff produced the following evidence indicating benefits to defendants’ remaining property: the witness Frank Gordon testified he appraised the property on 1 April 1974 before the taking; he also appraised the property after the taking; the property…