Legal Opinion

City of Statesville v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1956No. 385PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The only issue for determination by the jury was the amount of compensation to which defendant was entitled.

The court instructed the jury: “Now, members of the jury, the court instructs you that under the estate sought to be acquired by the plaintiff that the defendant would have the right at any time prior to the asserting of the easement acquired to remove from the premises the house that has been described as being on the property, or being on the line of the property. The court instructs you that at any time prior to asserting the rights sought to be acquired by the plaintiff that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirkman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Williams v. STATE HIGHWAY COM. OF NORTH CAROLINASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. North Carolina Board of Transportation v. RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Glace v. Town of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Robinson v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API