Legal Opinion
Asher v. William L. Crow Const. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1953PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff to remand this action to the City Court of the City of New York where it was commenced. The action was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), to recover for regular time and overtime compensation. It was removed by defendant, pursuant to Section 1441 of Title 28 U.S.C.A. There is neither diversity of citizenship nor $3,000 in controversy.
The district court has jurisdiction of such an action regardless of the amount in controversy or the citizenship of the parties. Johnson v. Butler Bros., 8 Cir., 1947, 162…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Bradley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951
- Maloy v. FriedmanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
- Dando v. Stonhard Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
- Korell v. Bymart, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Angel M. Cosme Nieves v. Col. Robert C. Deshler, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- James River Apartments, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Carter v. Hill & Hill Truck Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
- Vann v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.