Dando v. Stonhard Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
This action was instituted under the provisions of Section 216(b), Title 29 U.S. C.A., relating to the general subject of Fair Labor Standards. It is provided by said subsection (b) that: “Action to recover such liability may' be maintained in any court of competent jurisdiction by any one or more employees for and in behalf of himself or themselves and other employees similarly situated * * In this case the amount in controversy is more than $3,000 and there is a diversity of citizenship. The defendant, therefore, claims the right of removal under-the general removal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Fredman v. Foley Bros., Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1943
- Young v. Arbyrd Compress Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lockard v. Equifax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Haun v. Retail Credit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wilkins v. Renault Southwest, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1964
- Asher v. William L. Crow Const. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Niswander v. Paul Hardeman, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.