Legal Opinion

Vann v. Jackson

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958No. Civ. 547PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are the present owners and former owners of lands located in Sampson County, North Carolina, upon which tobacco is produced for market, subject to the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 1281-1407, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

Defendants constitute the Local Review Committee appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture to review, upon application, the established marketing quota of any dissatisfied farmer of the county, pursuant to section 363 of the Act. 7 U.S.C.A. § 1363.

The Review Committee having reduced the tobacco…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Crolley v. TattonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Bradley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Minnesota v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
  5. Asher v. William L. Crow Const. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Arnold London v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Manas Y Pineiro v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Folts v. City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API