Legal Opinion

Hecketsweiler v. Parrett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Defendant, J. S. Parrett, on April 20, 1946, listed for sale with plaintiff, O. J. Heeketsweiler, a real estate broker, his ranch consisting of approximately 275 acres located in Lane County at the price of $25,000 cash. The listing was non-exclusive and was not for any definite period of time. Among other things the listing agreement provided that “In the event that you [the broker] find a buyer ready and willing to enter into a deal for said selling price and terms, or such other terms and price as I may accept * * * I hereby agree to pay you in cash for Amur services in connection with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Watters v. DanceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dent v. PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. In Re Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Ellingsworth v. ShannonOregon Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Duprey v. DonahoeWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API