Legal Opinion

Hingsbergen v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1966No. Civ. 22735PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

The State Personnel Board appeals from the judgment of the superior court ordering the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate requiring the board to set aside its decision dismissing respondent from his civil service position in the Department of Motor Vehicles, sometimes referred to herein as DMV.

Respondent was employed by the department from January 18, 1932 to June 26, 1963. On the latter date he was served with a preliminary notice of punitive action of dismissal. (Gov. Code, § 19574.) His position was then that of assistant chief special investigator.

Thereafter, respondent was charged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Shepherd v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Angelo Dahlia v. Omar RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Nightingale v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Szmaciarz v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Wilson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API