Legal Opinion

People v. Rand

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 1997No. 1-95-2451PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien

Following a jury trial, defendant, James Rand, was found guilty of stalking Michelle Fire (hereinafter Fire) and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, contending: (1) the trial court erred by denying his request to waive a jury trial; (2) the stalking statute is unconstitutional; (3) the jury instructions deprived him of his right to a unanimous verdict; (4) the trial court improperly failed to appoint separate counsel and hold an evidentiary hearing regarding the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel raised in his pro se motion for new trial; and (5) the trial court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. NitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. People v. CauseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. ConleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. People v. ZamudioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. People v. CaciniAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API