Legal Opinion

Moore v. Everest & Halley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1938No. 27865Published

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Mrs. D. A. Schwint died leaving a small estate, for which an ad-ministratrix was appointed. Later a will was discovered and the administratrix was replaced by plaintiff in error, Shubert, as administrator with the will annexed. In the meantime Mrs. Schwint’s husband, R. Schwint, died leaving a large estate. Shu-bert employed plaintiff in error, Charles L. Moore, as attorney to recover certain claimed interests for the estate of Mrs. Schwint from the estate of R. Schwint. It was agreed that Moore was to receive 20 per cent, of the amount recovered. The county court’s approval of this agreement…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In re Estate of PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Freese v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. In re the Estate of HirschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API