Legal Opinion
Tydeman v. Flaherty
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 2, 1994No. 89-10-284; CA A72384PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
In this legal malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal a judgment dismissing their sixth amended complaint for failure to state a claim. ORCP 21A(8). We reverse.
In reviewing the granting of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we assume the truth of all allegations, as well as any inferences that may be drawn from them. Oksenholt v. Lederle Laboratories, 294 Or 213, 215, 656 P2d 293 (1982). We disregard allegations that are conclusions of law. Emmert v. O’Brien, 72 Or App 752, 754, 697 P2d 222 (1985).
Plaintiffs’ eighth and ninth claims for relief span 37 pages. Because we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Hilt v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Pereira v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Yanney v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Huang v. ClaussenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Thompson v. Estate of Adrian L. PannellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.