Legal Opinion
Huang v. Claussen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 26, 1997No. 95C-12113; CA A92315PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants in a breach of contract action. ORS 19.010(1); ORS 19.020. The judgment was based on the trial court’s order dismissing plaintiffs complaint 1 for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21 A(8). We review for errors of law, Hansen v. Anderson, 113 Or App 216, 218, 831 P2d 717 (1992), and affirm.
In considering the sufficiency of plaintiffs complaint, we accept as true all well-pleaded allegations and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom, Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc., 314 Or 576, 584, 841 P2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buchler v. Oregon Corrections Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Clagett v. DacyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Hansen v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Fulmer v. Timber Inn Restaurant & Lounge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Berg v. HirschyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Ramex, Inc. v. Northwest Basic IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Richards v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.