Legal Opinion

Rapp v. Sarpy County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1904No. 13,428PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to the district court for Sarpy county: George A. Day, Jubge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

In an action against a county for negligently permitting a. highway to become and remain out of repair, causing a personal injury to the plaintiff, a traveler thereon, the answer, besides a general denial, pleaded contributory negligence. The court gave the following instruction, which was excepted to:

*383“The defendant has also pleaded contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff as a defense to this action. The bnrden of proving contributory negligence, by a preponderance of the evidence, rests upon the defendant, and, unless the defendant has so proved it, this defense is of no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heinemann v. . HeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. New Omaha Thompson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. RomboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. FeatherlyNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mundy v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Shiman Bros. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mercer v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API