Legal Opinion

Mundy v. Davis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1951No. 32915PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWenke, J.

John Mundy brought this action in the district court for Douglas County against Titus E. Davis. The purpose of the action is to recover for damages resulting from injuries allegedly caused by the negligent conduct of defendant. Plaintiff recovered a verdict. The court entered judgment thereon. Defendant thereupon filed a motion for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. These motions were both overruled. Defendant appeals from the overruling thereof.

Appellant contends that the trial court should have either sustained his motion for a directed verdict or for *425a judgment…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Roth v. BlomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Remmenga v. SelkNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Plumb v. BurnhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Buresh v. GeorgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Fimple v. Archer Ballroom Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Borcherding v. EklundNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Guerin v. ForburgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Steinauer v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API