Legal Opinion
Hy-Lo Unit & Metal Products Co. v. Remote Control Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1936No. 7833PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant is the owner of patent No. 1,617,094, issued to it as assignee of Charles Atherton in February, 1927, for a remote control gas valve to be operated in-connection with a heating furnace. It brought this action against the appellee for the infringement of that patent.
Appellee admits that the device manufactured by it would infringe the patent if valid, but denies the validity of the patent on the ground that the same was anticipated by an invention by one El Roy L. Payne. Payne had applied for a patent on his invention before Atherton had applied for the patent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Stryker v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gonzalez Abreau v. Banco CentralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Sylvania Industrial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.